Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1
.s. commitment to bill would be epaa site in 2018 is ironclad. does that mean the obama speech in prague 2009, an agreement with iran over nuclear weapons program, if that were to be achieved robustly, a rethinking of epaa, are they now locked in, and they are no longer valid? >> so we've made a substantial commitment to homeland missile defense and the deterrent so when the department went through the choices, management review, those were among the three capabilities highlighted, and protected, and preserved, and part and parcel of that, and as we go through various budget deliberations, it's hard to protect the things you want to protect, and epa is one of those things we really want to protect, and so we've done, so far, a pretty good job protecting phases two, phase one, phase two, and phase three. obviously, we canceled phase four, but that's really where there is a connection between your question and iran. okay. we saw a rapidly emerging north korean threat and moves resources and assets to go after that more emergence, more near term threat, the long term threat from north korea to p
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1